重庆理工大学学报(自然科学) ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 159-168.

• 信息·计算机 • 上一篇    下一篇

社区建成环境对中等收入群体机动车行驶里程的非线性影响模型

王振科,白云鹏   

  1. (1.重庆交通大学 交通运输学院,重庆 400074; 2.重庆恒畅规划设计研究院,重庆 400074; 3.重庆市市政设计研究院有限公司,重庆 400014)
  • 出版日期:2023-06-21 发布日期:2023-06-21
  • 作者简介:王振科,男,博士研究生,主要从事交通规划及交通大数据研究,Email:947759963@qq.com

A nonlinear impact model of community built environment on vehicle miles traveled of middle-income groups

  • Online:2023-06-21 Published:2023-06-21

摘要: 基于社区建成环境的 5D维度选取了人口密度、土地利用多样性、公交服务水平等 6个指标刻画社区建成环境,以《社区生活圈规划技术指南》中15min社区生活圈与步行速度为 依据,形成社区生活圈测度范围,结合 POI(pointofinterest)数据、道路网络等地理空间数据测度 建成环境。以保定市居民出行行为调查数据作为实证研究数据,构建了考虑非线性效应的梯度 提升决策树(gradientboostingdecisiontree,GBDT)模型。结果表明:在模型拟合度方面,GBDT 模型比线性假设的 OLS(ordinaryleastsquares)模型调整后 R2 (可决系数)提高了 76%;在社区 建成环境指标贡献度方面,土地利用混合度(19.10%)与距离市中心的距离(17.23%)对中等 收入人群 VMT的贡献度最大,说明合理的土地利用规划对调节中等收入人群小汽车使用行为 的重要作用;在建成环境指标的非线性关系方面,建成环境因子与 VMT均具有非线性关系,其 中土地利用混合度、公交站点密度与距离市中心的距离对 VMT的影响与驾龄存在一定的交互 效应,通过部分相关图的拐点分析得到社区建成环境规划的定量依据是未来低碳社区建设的 基础。

关键词: 城市交通, 建成环境, 机动车行驶里程, GBDT模型, 非线性效应

Abstract:

With an increasing proportion of middle-income groups in the population structure, quantitative analysis of the nonlinear impact of community built environment on vehicle miles traveled (VMT) of middle-income groups has become an important basis for finely guiding the community life circle to create a green travel built environment. Based on the 5D of the built environment, this paper selects six indicators such as population density, land use diversity and public transport service levels to describe the built environment of a community.

Based on the 15-minute community life circle and walking speed in Technical Guide for Community Life Circle Planning, the measurement range of the community life circle is formed. The built environment is measured by combining point of interest (POI) data, road networks and other geospatial data. Taking Baoding residents’ travel behavior survey data as the source of empirical research, this paper constructs a gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model that considers nonlinear effects. In terms of model fitting, the GBDT model improves the adjusted R2 76% higher than the ordinary least squares (OLS) model with linear assumptions does, and performs better than machine learning models such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) do, indicating that the GBDT model has better adaptability in this study. In terms of the contribution of built environment indicators, the built environment attributes have a greater effect on VMT than individual social and economic attributes do, with land use mixing degree (19.10%) and distance from the city center (17.23%) contributing the most to VMT of middle-income people, which reflects the important role of reasonable land use planning in regulating middle-income people’s car use. In addition, the lowest contributor is public transportation service level (5.72%). This may be due to the fact that the middle-income group has a high travel demand with high time efficiency and high quality requirements for travel modes, and based on the preliminary research, the existing public transportation service level in the study area is still low, resulting in an inability to effectively attract the middle-income group. In terms of the nonlinear relationships of built environment indicators, the built environment factors have nonlinear relationships with VMT. The overall relationship between population density and VMT is “V-shaped”, and the lowest value of the VMT curve corresponds to a population density of 18 000 people/km2. The overall effect of community land use mixing on VMT is negative, and the threshold effect point is 0.6. When the land use mixing exceeds 0.6, it can effectively limit VMT. The influence of road density and intersection density on VMT is negatively correlated, and their threshold points are 7.6 km/km2 and 22 /buffer respectively. Overall, the impact of public transportation service levels on VMT is positively correlated, with no significant threshold relationship. For the bivariate interaction non-linear relationship, the influence of land use mixing, bus stop density and distance from the city center on VMT has a certain interaction effect with the driving age.

In general, the effect of the built environment on VMT reduces as the driving age increases. In particular, the inhibitory effect of land use mixing on VMT is substantially weak for those who have been driving for more than 10 years. In terms of public transportation service levels, for those with more than 3 years’ of driving experience, the effect on controlling the intensity of car use among middle-income people is less pronounced. In terms of distance from the city center, for those with more than 7 years’ of driving experience, the effect of reducing the distance from the city center on suppressing small car use begins to diminish. Among the nonlinear effects of the built environment on VMT, it is worthwhile for planning managers to pay attention to the inflection point of nonlinearity, which contains the optimal value range of built environment indicators on the one hand and the effect range of built environment indicators on the other hand. Therefore, community spatial planners are advised to develop a refined design of community built environment in order to effectively suppress VMT.

中图分类号: 

  • U491