重庆理工大学学报(自然科学) ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 69-76.

• 车辆工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑后车不同初始状态的安全距离模型

李清清,简晓春,吴胜利   

  1. 重庆交通大学 交通运输学院,重庆 40007
  • 出版日期:2023-04-26 发布日期:2023-04-26
  • 作者简介:李清清,女,硕士研究生,主要从事汽车主动安全研究,Email:2402939066@qq.com;通信作者 简晓春,男,硕士, 教授,主要从事汽车主动安全研究,Email:jianli@cqjtu.edu.cn。

Research on the safety distance model consideringdifferent initial states of rear vehicles

  • Online:2023-04-26 Published:2023-04-26

摘要: 传统安全距离模型主要依靠车辆间运动学关系建立,且后车接收预警信号时的初 始状态常被视为匀速行驶,导致模型精度不高、普适性差,影响前向碰撞预警系统可靠性。针对 以上问题,考虑了后车不同初始状态,结合运动学与动力学方法综合分析车辆制动过程,进行纵 向动力学建模,根据前车运动状态建立安全距离模型,通过仿真试验得出后车不同初始状态下 预警安全距离的差异及变化规律。仿真结果表明:后车初始加/减速状态和初始匀速状态的预 警安全距离存在差异,差异大小与后车初始加/减速度值、行驶速度有关,且前车处于制动工况 时差异尤为显著,预警安全距离的差值最大可达 18.69m,相对变化率达到 49.53%。考虑后车 不同初始状态的安全距离模型更加符合实际情况,可有效提高预警系统对车辆安全状态判断的 准确性。

关键词: :前向预警系统, 安全距离模型, 初始状态, 动力学建模

Abstract:

Establishing an accurate and reasonable evaluation model of driving safety status is one of the key technologies of the forward collision warning system. As the most classical evaluation model of driving safety status, safe distance has the advantages of universality and robustness. However, traditional safety distance models often assume the initial state of the rear car receiving the warning signal as uniform motion and rely solely on the analysis of vehicle kinematics to determine the safety distance. Due to the complex force situation and multiple influencing factors during vehicle braking, analyzing braking distance only from a kinematic perspective may reduce the accuracy of the model and thus affect the reliability of the warning system.

To address these issues, this paper considers three different motion states of the rear car, including initial uniform motion, acceleration, and deceleration. Combining kinematics and dynamics methods, the force situation of a vehicle during each stage of the braking process is comprehensively analyzed for different initial states of the rear car. Longitudinal dynamic modeling is then conducted to establish safety distance models based on the front car’s stationary state, uniform or accelerated motion state, and emergency braking state. Simulation experiments are carried out to obtain the differences and variation patterns of the warning safety distance under different initial states of the rear car.

The simulation results show that there are differences in the warning safety distance for the following vehicle’s initial acceleration/deceleration state and initial uniform motion state, and the difference size is related to the initial acceleration/deceleration value and driving speed of the following vehicle. The difference in the warning safety distance generated by different initial states of the following vehicle increases with an increase in the initial acceleration/deceleration value, with a distance difference of the front vehicle’s braking condition being the most significant of up to 18.69 m.When the following vehicle initially decelerates, the reduction rate of the warning safety distance can reach a maximum of 49.53% compared with the initial uniform motion state. Regardless of the initial state, when the following vehicle’s driving speed increases, the warning safety distance also increases. The difference in the warning safety distance still increases with an increase in the driving speed, but the relative increase/decrease rate of the warning safety distance in the initial acceleration/deceleration state decreases compared with the initial uniform motion state. When the following vehicle reaches a relatively high driving speed, the impact of different initial states on the warning safety distance becomes less significant.

In summary, the following vehicle’s initial state is an important factor affecting the safety distance. By analyzing the different initial states of the following vehicle and combining kinematic and dynamic methods to model the safety distance with multiple factors, it is possible to more accurately determine the driving safety status, reduce the false alarm rate of the warning system, and improve the accuracy and coordination adaptability of the forward collision warning system.

中图分类号: 

  • U461